Home / Compare / Cursor vs Meta Llama 3
Cursor The AI-first code editor built for pair programming
5.0
Visit Cursor
Free plan available
VS
Meta Llama 3 The open-source AI revolutionizing developer ecosystems
4.9
Visit Meta Llama 3
Free plan available

Ratings Comparison

Cursor Meta Llama 3
Ease of Use
4.8 / 4.2
Features
5.0 / 5.0
Value for Money
4.9 / 5.0
Customer Support
4.5 / 4.4
Overall Rating
5.0 / 4.9

Feature Comparison

Feature Cursor Meta Llama 3
Pricing Model Subscription Free
Starting Price $20.00/mo Free
Free Plan ✓ Yes ✓ Yes
Free Trial ✓ 14 days ✗ No
API Available ✗ No ✓ Yes
Mobile App ✗ No ✗ No
Browser Extension ✗ No ✗ No
Desktop App ✓ Yes ✗ No
Team Collaboration ✓ Yes ✗ No
SSO Support ✓ Yes
GDPR Compliant ✓ Yes ✓ Yes
HIPAA Compliant ✓ Yes
Open Source ✓ Yes
AI Model Claude 3.5 Sonnet / GPT-4o / custom Llama 3.1 (8B, 70B, 405B)
Model Provider Anthropic / OpenAI / Cursor Meta
Context Window Up to 200,000 tokens 128,000 tokens
Company Anysphere Inc. Meta Platforms, Inc.
HQ United States United States
Founded 2022 2004
Funding Stage Series a Public
Total Funding $60 million raised Publicly Traded ($1T+ Market Cap)
Overall Rating 5.0 ★ (8950 reviews) 4.9 ★ (15400 reviews)

Our Verdict

Cursor and Meta Llama 3 are both strong tools with different strengths. Based on 8950 user reviews, Cursor has a higher rating of 5.0/5. Overall, Meta Llama 3 edges ahead in this comparison — but we recommend trying both using free trials before deciding.

Choose based on your need
API / developer use Meta Llama 3
Team collaboration Cursor
Highest user rating Cursor
Cursor Quick Info
Pricing Subscription
Free Plan ✓ Yes
API ✗ No
Mobile App ✗ No
Rating 5.0 / 5
Visit Cursor
Meta Llama 3 Quick Info
Pricing Free
Free Plan ✓ Yes
API ✓ Yes
Mobile App ✗ No
Rating 4.9 / 5
Visit Meta Llama 3