Home / Compare / Meta Llama 3 vs Cursor
Meta Llama 3 The open-source AI revolutionizing developer ecosystems
4.9
Visit Meta Llama 3
Free plan available
VS
Cursor The AI-first code editor built for pair programming
5.0
Visit Cursor
Free plan available

Ratings Comparison

Meta Llama 3 Cursor
Ease of Use
4.2 / 4.8
Features
5.0 / 5.0
Value for Money
5.0 / 4.9
Customer Support
4.4 / 4.5
Overall Rating
4.9 / 5.0

Feature Comparison

Feature Meta Llama 3 Cursor
Pricing Model Free Subscription
Starting Price Free $20.00/mo
Free Plan ✓ Yes ✓ Yes
Free Trial ✗ No ✓ 14 days
API Available ✓ Yes ✗ No
Mobile App ✗ No ✗ No
Browser Extension ✗ No ✗ No
Desktop App ✗ No ✓ Yes
Team Collaboration ✗ No ✓ Yes
SSO Support — ✓ Yes
GDPR Compliant ✓ Yes ✓ Yes
HIPAA Compliant ✓ Yes —
Open Source ✓ Yes —
AI Model Llama 3.1 (8B, 70B, 405B) Claude 3.5 Sonnet / GPT-4o / custom
Model Provider Meta Anthropic / OpenAI / Cursor
Context Window 128,000 tokens Up to 200,000 tokens
Company Meta Platforms, Inc. Anysphere Inc.
HQ United States United States
Founded 2004 2022
Funding Stage Public Series a
Total Funding Publicly Traded ($1T+ Market Cap) $60 million raised
Overall Rating 4.9 ★ (15400 reviews) 5.0 ★ (8950 reviews)

Our Verdict

Meta Llama 3 and Cursor are both strong tools with different strengths. Based on 8950 user reviews, Cursor has a higher rating of 5.0/5. Overall, Meta Llama 3 edges ahead in this comparison — but we recommend trying both using free trials before deciding.

Related Comparisons

Also Compare

Choose based on your need
API / developer use Meta Llama 3
Team collaboration Cursor
Highest user rating Cursor
Meta Llama 3 Quick Info
Pricing Free
Free Plan ✓ Yes
API ✓ Yes
Mobile App ✗ No
Rating 4.9 / 5
Visit Meta Llama 3
Cursor Quick Info
Pricing Subscription
Free Plan ✓ Yes
API ✗ No
Mobile App ✗ No
Rating 5.0 / 5
Visit Cursor